Webnexs video solution gives ability to broadcast your own Live streaming service and Video on Demand solution. This includes Cloud Hosting, CDN, Video CMS, Advance Transcoding, DRM and many more. Wplayer provide a compact solution for both the Android and iOS Devices.
Make your videos available for all the devices. Never mind if the viewers either from Android or IOS,wplayer Support Both Platform.
Wplayer is pre-designed and coded by professional developer to make sure that one can instantly start their own channel in a flash
Store the channel in sophisticated Cloud hosting boosted up with CDN and Secured firewall. We make sure hosting solution covers up all your business needs
Capability to manage everything that lets you to launch a Live Video Streaming.
Viewers can watch live stream on various social media through our integration.
Add advertisements, captions and URL links on your video streaming page.
Developed according to easy understanding of users with hassle free navigation.
Customized interface of streaming player according to your videos and demands
Adaptively store on bandwidth and storage space while distributing the finest playback quality in any bandwidth conditions.
Stream your video-on-demand content to desktop video players, mobile smartphones, set-top boxes, Flash players and OTT devices.
Scale up to multi-server installations with close to boundless capacity. Fetch VOD content efficiently from centralized storage to edge servers.
Select standard support for RTMP encrypted streams and HLS AES-128 security or else choose from a broad set of safety procedures.
Create as many as playlist according to choice, and the playlist can be scheduled to play on a stream at any specified time.
Give users an unlimited access to an extensive variety of programs for a monthly/yearly flat rate. Users have complete control over the subscription.
We power up videos for Large Media Companies, Enterprises andPopular Education Institutions with its awesome features.
Performance data that will keeps you winningamong competitor.
Ultimately It’s the customer Service and their feedback is important to us. Starting with simple Contact Over mail.
It's feature to develop\customize our own application without the need to do code is very innovative and it helps a lot. We can develop an application with the least workforce and can actually make it upto the market standards.
Review by - Kiran Sai Teja G.
Webnexs provides quick, accurate responses and effective solutions for industry challenges. Their easy-to-use, multifunctional platform meets business needs smoothly. Special thanks to Rajeev for his support from our initial meeting to platform development, ensuring smooth collaboration and customization.
Review by - Metehan D.
In less than two months we have developed and published on Android , Ios and Amazon Fire , with Android TV publishing imminent. We are now moving onto Phase 2, adding Samsung, Roku and LG into the mix. We already run a successful OTT platform on another service; and Webnexs has so far proved to be a good alternative,
Review by - Robert G.
Webnexs offers a feature-rich streaming platform that works smoothly across devices. Their team provided excellent support, helping us launch a 3-hour show with smart monetization options. Special thanks to making the entire process smooth and efficient.
Review by - Inna Segal T.
The support staff is excellent. They are working together to resolve any issue. The product looks very interesting and is availible in all platforms. For us clear choice. The price list is availible do you know what you pay for.
Review by - Kate K.
Key capabilities, workflow considerations, and architectural best practices for hosting, protecting, and streaming enterprise video at global scale.
A complete video stack spans more than playback. Content has to get in, which means upload, ingest from other systems, and handling whatever formats the source material arrives in. It has to be processed, which means transcoding, thumbnail generation, and extracting metadata. It has to be organized, with folders or tags, search, and permissions describing who may see what. It has to be delivered securely to the right people. And it has to be measured.
Organizations usually arrive at this after assembling the pieces separately and finding the seams. Video lives in one place, access control in another, and analytics nowhere in particular. Consolidating removes an entire category of problem, mainly the one where nobody is certain who can see a given video.
Public marketing video and internal video have almost nothing in common operationally. Internal content needs to respect the organization's existing identity system, so access follows the same accounts and groups as everything else, and revoking someone's access revokes it everywhere at once.
Beyond authentication there are several layers worth understanding. Signed playback URLs expire, so a link copied out of a page stops working. Domain restriction prevents an embed being lifted onto another site. DRM encrypts the content itself for material that genuinely warrants it. Visible watermarking showing the viewer's own name is a strong deterrent for confidential material, because it makes any leak attributable.
Video rarely stands alone. A learning platform needs completion data to mark a course finished. A customer support tool needs video embedded in articles. A marketing site needs playback events flowing to analytics. A content management system needs to list and select videos without a separate login.
This is why an API matters more than a feature list. A platform that can only be operated through its own interface becomes an island, and someone ends up maintaining a manual process to bridge it. Webhooks matter for the same reason: knowing when a transcode has finished or a viewer has completed a video lets other systems react without polling. Single sign-on removes a separate account for every user.
Running live streaming and an on-demand library as separate systems duplicates a surprising amount: two sets of accounts, two access models, two analytics views, and a manual step to move a recorded event into the library.
Using one platform for both means a live session can be recorded, processed and published as on-demand content automatically, inheriting the same permissions it had while live. For webinars, training and internal broadcasts this is most of the value, because the audience who could not attend is often larger than the audience who did. It also means one set of embed codes and one place to look when something needs finding later.
Video accumulates. Every upload produces a source file plus every rendition made from it, and the total grows steadily whether or not anyone watches the older material. Without a retention policy the archive expands indefinitely and the bill with it.
A workable approach has three parts. Move rarely accessed content to cheaper storage tiers, accepting slower retrieval for material nobody requests. Set retention rules by content type, because a recorded internal standup does not need keeping as long as a product launch. Decide whether source files are kept after transcoding, which matters when a new codec arrives and the catalog needs re-encoding.
Moving a library between platforms is mostly a metadata problem. The files themselves transfer mechanically. What breaks is everything pointing at them: embed codes across a website, links in documentation, references inside a learning platform.
A migration that only moves files leaves dead embeds scattered across systems nobody has inventoried. The sequence that works is to catalog where video is referenced before moving anything, migrate with identifiers preserved or mapped, keep the old platform serving during a transition period, then update references in batches and verify each one.
Getting video into the platform is straightforward for one file and quite different for a thousand. Bulk ingest needs to tolerate interruption, so a failed transfer resumes rather than restarting. It needs to accept the formats the source material actually arrives in, which is rarely a single tidy standard. And it needs to apply metadata automatically where possible.
Watch folders and API-driven ingest cover most bulk cases: content is dropped in one place or pushed programmatically, and the platform handles transcoding, thumbnails and publication according to rules set in advance.
A video library becomes unusable at roughly the point where nobody can remember what is in it. Filenames are a poor index and folder structures reflect how content was created rather than how it is looked for.
What makes a library searchable is metadata applied consistently: title, description, tags, who created it, when, and which part of the organization it belongs to. Transcripts add considerably more, because they make the spoken content searchable rather than only the labels attached to it, and they double as captions.
The decision usually comes down to control against operational burden. A hosted platform is faster to start, has no infrastructure to run, and scales without planning, but content sits with a provider and costs follow usage. Self-managed deployment keeps everything inside your own infrastructure with full configuration control.
The cost of self-managing is not the software, but the team who keeps it running, patched, monitored, and supported around the clock. Organizations that already run substantial infrastructure absorb this easily; others find hosted options more cost-effective.
Video inside an organization is usually made by multiple people, and the platform needs to reflect that. A recording is uploaded, someone edits or trims it, someone else reviews it, and only then should it be visible to its intended audience.
Useful workflow support means draft and published states, timestamp-tied feedback comments, and version handling so replacing a file does not break existing embeds or links.
The player is the part viewers actually touch, and a default player that looks like someone else's product undermines the impression the content is trying to make. Branding the controls, using your own colors, and setting custom poster frames are the minimum.
Beyond appearance, playback behavior is configurable per video: autoplay, muted start, variable playback speeds, download toggles, and sharing options tailored to each context (training vs. marketing hero videos).
Everything you need to know about our enterprise video solution software.